The Current Advertising Model is Broken, Part 2

You can read the first part here.

As I said, in this part I will share some numbers with you, so you can see how small the CTR is, using today’s advertising model.

Actionscript.org (forum)

We had our ads displayed for 12 days (18 Jan – 30 Jan), on a $500 campaign.

Impressions: 184,226
Clicks: 1,407
CTR: 0.76%

We canceled this ad.

Flash Speaks ActionScript (blog)

30 days (over), $50 campaign.

Impressions: 52,496
Clicks: 71
CTR: 0.10%

We canceled this ad.

WebTreats ETC (blog)

30 days, $15 campaign.

Impressions: 93,172
Clicks: 17
CTR: 0.02%

We are going to cancel this ad. This is the 14th day.

Web Design Booth (blog)

30 days, $40 campaign.

Impressions: 82,262
Clicks: 22
CTR: 0.03%

We are going to cancel this ad. This is the 13th day.

Google AdWords

Google is charging per click, which is the right way if you ask me. (10 months campaign)

Impressions: 95,248
Clicks: 1,074
CTR: 1.13%

Cost: $218


There is an additional blog we are currently still advertising on, but since we are not going to cancel the ad yet, I won’t post it here, so we have real data when we decide to close the campaign.

Conclusions

Based on the numbers above, you can see that Google’s AdWords is the best advertising option there is today, because it is the most targeted campaign, due to the fact that users are searching for something specific, which Google serves through their search engine. The trick is they add the advertiser’s links first. And we are one of those advertisers.

Although Google’s CTR is just a bit over 1%, it’s still the best value one can get today.

It’s too bad Actionscript.org, with almost double the impressions in just 12 days, has a smaller CTR, and the money paid for the campaign are twice as much as what was spent on Google. It’s important to notice the daily impressions number on the blogs, way above Google’s impressions.

In Part 3, I will share our solution. I will write this part in 4 months, so until then, I strongly advise you use AdWords for your advertising campaigns. :-)

This post has 2 comments | Post your comment

  • Andrei - RossGuide
  • on October 1, 2010 at 9:18 PM

    Imi pare rau sa iti spun dar nu ai obtinut rezultatele scontate cu flabell sau alte siteuri pentru ca siteul tau nu este unde ar trebui sa fie .
    Siteul nu este optimizat iar modelul de advertising olosit este asa cum spui ( din alte motive decat ale mele )gresit .

    In loc de o campanie de pay per click de 500 de dolarii sau mai mult ar fii trebuit sa pornesti cu inceputul adica un corporate branding , research si optimizare site cu urmarire conversie , research pe top 10 competitor si asa mai departe.Un simplu exemplu flash component returneaza ~ 45 000 de cautari globale /luna in toate limbile in toate tarile .Nu te astepta sa primesti mai mult de 15 visite/zi (daca le primesti si pe alea) din goggle daca esti in prima pagina .Tu esti in pozitia 73 pe pagina 8 adica probabil vei primi 15 pe saptamana .

    Toate astea erau foarte usor de evitat iar costurile se returnau daca apelai la sem – facut bine .
    Daca esti interesat de subiect si veri raportul de pozitionare pentru flabell si flash components flash development simple flash mp3 player xml banner rotator xml image slideshow

    yahoo andreibujaki sau rossguide
    0745 896 221
    http://www.linkedin.com/in/rossguide/
    Weekend Placut

Reply
    • Andrei Potorac
    • on October 4, 2010 at 12:56 PM

      Multumesc pentru comentariu! Site-ul este optimizat pt SEO, iar vizitele pe care le avem pe site sunt cu mult mai multe.

      Cred ca nu inteleg concret unde sugerezi sa imbunatatim lucrurile. Poti detalia?

Join the conversation!

Let me know what you think